NVIDIA Tesla T4 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 3 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 16 nm
- 2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 150 Watt
- 1250x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 8 GB/s
- Environ 36% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 versus 44908
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 versus 1718.593
- Environ 53% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 versus 12.283
- 4.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 versus 28.289
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 versus 710.366
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 versus 13765
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 versus 13765
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 versus 10 June 2016 |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 150 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 8 GB/s |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 versus 44908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 versus 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 versus 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 versus 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 versus 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 versus 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 versus 13765 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Environ 50% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 1005 MHz
- Environ 11% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1683 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 13509 versus 10909
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 versus 596
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 versus 127.622
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 1781
- Environ 87% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 versus 1976
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 1781
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 1005 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1683 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 13509 versus 10909 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 versus 596 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 versus 127.622 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 1781 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 1976 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 1781 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 | 13509 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 851 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 44908 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 150.951 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 1718.593 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 12.283 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 28.289 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 710.366 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 13765 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
Nom de code | TU104 | GP104 |
Date de sortie | 13 September 2018 | 10 June 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 263 | 278 |
Genre | Workstation | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $379 | |
Prix maintenant | $359.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1515 MHz | 1683 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 16 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13,600 million | 7,200 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 1920 | |
Performance á point flottant | 6,463 gflops | |
Température maximale du GPU | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1920 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 202.0 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 8-pin |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 256 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
SLI | ||
Virtual Reality |