NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 1250x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 44918
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1718.593
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 12.283
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 28.289
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 710.366
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 13765
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 13765
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 10 June 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 44918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 vs 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 vs 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 vs 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 vs 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 13765 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13508 vs 10909
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 851 vs 596
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 vs 127.622
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1781
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1781
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13508 vs 10909 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 851 vs 596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 vs 127.622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 1781 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10909 | 13508 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 596 | 851 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 44918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 150.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6066 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 10 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 262 | 278 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
| Price now | $359.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1920 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1920 | |
| Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Tesla T4 with others
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6610M
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8770 OEM
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIAQuadro P3200 Max-Q
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
AMDRadeon RX 590
NVIDIATesla T4 vs
NVIDIARTX A500 Embedded
