NVIDIA Tesla T4 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla T4 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla T4
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 12 nm vs 16 nm
- 2x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 1250x more memory clock speed: 10000 MHz vs 8 GB/s
- Around 29% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 61276 vs 47476
- Around 76% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3026.812 vs 1718.593
- Around 53% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 18.798 vs 12.283
- 4.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 119.936 vs 28.289
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 910.721 vs 710.366
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14076 vs 13765
- Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14076 vs 13765
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2018 vs 10 June 2016 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm vs 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 vs 47476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 vs 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 vs 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 vs 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 vs 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 vs 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 vs 13765 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
- Around 50% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 1005 MHz
- Around 11% higher boost clock speed: 1683 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13504 vs 10616
- Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 847 vs 592
- Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 150.951 vs 127.622
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 1781
- Around 87% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1976
- Around 88% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 1781
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 1005 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1683 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 13504 vs 10616 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 847 vs 592 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 vs 127.622 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 1781 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla T4
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop)
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 | 13504 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 | 847 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 61276 | 47476 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 127.622 | 150.951 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3026.812 | 1718.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 18.798 | 12.283 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 119.936 | 28.289 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 910.721 | 710.366 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14076 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1976 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1781 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14076 | 13765 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1976 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1781 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1082 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Tesla T4 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Desktop) | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Code name | TU104 | GP104 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2018 | 10 June 2016 |
| Place in performance rating | 270 | 288 |
| Type | Workstation | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $379 | |
| Price now | $359.99 | |
| Value for money (0-100) | 45.72 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1515 MHz | 1683 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1005 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 150 Watt |
| Transistor count | 13,600 million | 7,200 million |
| CUDA cores | 1920 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,463 gflops | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 1920 | |
| Texture fill rate | 202.0 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 8-pin |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Length | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Recommended system power (PSU) | 500 Watt | |
| Width | 2-slot | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Memory clock speed | 10000 MHz | 8 GB/s |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
