NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER versus AMD Radeon R9 290X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and AMD Radeon R9 290X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 6 ans 0 mois plus tard
- Environ 82% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 947 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 138.0 GTexel/s versus 176.0 GTexel / s
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 100 Watt versus 250 Watt
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10165 versus 8567
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 55744 versus 43410
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 178.014 versus 117.322
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 787.025 versus 628.757
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13569 versus 8729
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13569 versus 8729
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 versus 24 October 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 947 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s versus 176.0 GTexel / s |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt versus 250 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10165 versus 8567 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55744 versus 43410 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 versus 117.322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 versus 11.12 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 versus 628.757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 versus 8729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 versus 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 versus 8729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 versus 3353 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 290X
- 2.2x plus de pipelines: 2816 versus 1280
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 757 versus 750
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2460.464 versus 1961.932
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 120.942 versus 109.29
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7055 versus 3715
- Environ 90% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7055 versus 3715
- 11x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3932 versus 357
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 2816 versus 1280 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 757 versus 750 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2460.464 versus 1961.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 120.942 versus 109.29 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7055 versus 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7055 versus 3715 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3932 versus 357 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 290X
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10165 | 8567 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 750 | 757 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 55744 | 43410 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 178.014 | 117.322 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1961.932 | 2460.464 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 11.169 | 11.12 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 109.29 | 120.942 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 787.025 | 628.757 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13569 | 8729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 7055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3353 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13569 | 8729 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 7055 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3353 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 357 | 3932 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER | AMD Radeon R9 290X | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | TU116 | Hawaii |
| Date de sortie | 22 Nov 2019 | 24 October 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 287 | 289 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $549 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz | 947 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 138.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 8.832 TFLOPS (2:1) | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 4.416 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2816 |
| Pixel fill rate | 55.20 GPixel/s | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 138.0 GTexel/s | 176.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 100 Watt | 250 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 6600 million | 6,200 million |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,632 gflops | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1xDVI, 1xHDMI, 1xDisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9 inches (229 mm) | 275 mm |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 350 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin |
| Largeur | Dual-slot | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192 GB/s | 320 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 bit | 512 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| CrossFire | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| HD3D | ||
| LiquidVR | ||
| TressFX | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon R9 290X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1080 (Desktop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Mobile 6 GB
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon RX 560X Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 SUPER vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX Vega M GL
