AMD Radeon HD 6670 vs ATI Radeon HD 5870
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon HD 6670 und ATI Radeon HD 5870 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon HD 6670
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- 2.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 66 Watt vs 188 Watt
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 1905 vs 1858
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 19 April 2011 vs 23 September 2009 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 66 Watt vs 188 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1905 vs 1858 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der ATI Radeon HD 5870
- Etwa 6% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 850 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 3.5x mehr Texturfüllrate: 68.0 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s
- 3.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1600 vs 480
- 3.5x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 2,720.0 gflops vs 768.0 gflops
- 4.6x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 4800 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2199 vs 724
- Etwa 68% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 vs 247
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.789 vs 4.861
- 5.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1339.688 vs 235.463
- 3.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.775 vs 0.463
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.496 vs 15.918
- 6.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.813 vs 38.551
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 vs 1564
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3671 vs 3260
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 vs 1564
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3671 vs 3260
| Spezifikationen | |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 850 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 68.0 GTexel / s vs 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 1600 vs 480 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,720.0 gflops vs 768.0 gflops |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 4800 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2199 vs 724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 vs 247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.789 vs 4.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1339.688 vs 235.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.775 vs 0.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.496 vs 15.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 vs 38.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4541 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3671 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 vs 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4541 vs 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3671 vs 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 vs 3348 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6670
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 724 | 2199 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1905 | 1858 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.861 | 18.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.463 | 1339.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.463 | 1.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 | 43.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.551 | 245.813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1564 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1564 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| AMD Radeon HD 6670 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Codename | Turks | Cypress |
| Design | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
| Startdatum | 19 April 2011 | 23 September 2009 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $99 | $399 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1255 | 770 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $102.99 | |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 13.12 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 768.0 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 480 | 1600 |
| Texturfüllrate | 19.2 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 66 Watt | 188 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 716 million | 2,154 million |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 850 MHz | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
| Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Länge | 168 mm | 282 mm |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 2x 6-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 64 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1050 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologien |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
