AMD Radeon HD 6670 versus ATI Radeon HD 5870
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon HD 6670 and ATI Radeon HD 5870 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon HD 6670
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 6 mois plus tard
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 66 Watt versus 188 Watt
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 1905 versus 1858
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 19 April 2011 versus 23 September 2009 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt versus 188 Watt |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1905 versus 1858 |
Raisons pour considerer le ATI Radeon HD 5870
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 850 MHz versus 800 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 68.0 GTexel / s versus 19.2 GTexel / s
- 3.3x plus de pipelines: 1600 versus 480
- 3.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,720.0 gflops versus 768.0 gflops
- 4.6x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 4800 MHz versus 1050 MHz
- 3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2199 versus 724
- Environ 68% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 versus 247
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 18.789 versus 4.861
- 5.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1339.688 versus 235.463
- 3.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.775 versus 0.463
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 43.496 versus 15.918
- 6.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 245.813 versus 38.551
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4541 versus 1564
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3671 versus 3260
- 2.9x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4541 versus 1564
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3671 versus 3260
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 850 MHz versus 800 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.0 GTexel / s versus 19.2 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1600 versus 480 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,720.0 gflops versus 768.0 gflops |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 4800 MHz versus 1050 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2199 versus 724 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 416 versus 247 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 18.789 versus 4.861 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1339.688 versus 235.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.775 versus 0.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 43.496 versus 15.918 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 245.813 versus 38.551 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4541 versus 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3671 versus 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3349 versus 3348 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4541 versus 1564 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3671 versus 3260 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3349 versus 3348 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon HD 6670
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 5870
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon HD 6670 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 724 | 2199 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 247 | 416 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1905 | 1858 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 4.861 | 18.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 235.463 | 1339.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.463 | 1.775 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.918 | 43.496 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 38.551 | 245.813 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1564 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3260 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3348 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1564 | 4541 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3260 | 3671 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3348 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 0 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon HD 6670 | ATI Radeon HD 5870 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | Turks | Cypress |
| Conception | AMD Radeon HD 6000 Series | ATI Radeon HD 5000 Series |
| Date de sortie | 19 April 2011 | 23 September 2009 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $99 | $399 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1255 | 770 |
| Prix maintenant | $102.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.12 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 800 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 768.0 gflops | 2,720.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 480 | 1600 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 19.2 GTexel / s | 68.0 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 66 Watt | 188 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 716 million | 2,154 million |
| Vitesse du noyau | 850 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 168 mm | 282 mm |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 11 | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 64 GB/s | 153.6 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1050 MHz | 4800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Technologies |
||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| CrossFire | ||
