AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD Radeon Pro 575
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon Pro 570 und AMD Radeon Pro 575 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Etwa 10% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1096 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- Etwa 26% höhere Texturfüllrate: 140.8 GTexel / s vs 112.0 GTexel / s
- Etwa 14% höhere Leitungssysteme: 2048 vs 1792
- Etwa 26% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 4,506 gflops vs 3,584 gflops
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34797 vs 30276
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.154 vs 74.958
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1090.128 vs 1070.209
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 vs 6.94
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.349 vs 89.457
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 vs 436.958
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 vs 7664
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2814 vs 2340
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 vs 7664
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2814 vs 2340
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1096 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 140.8 GTexel / s vs 112.0 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 2048 vs 1792 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4,506 gflops vs 3,584 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34797 vs 30276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 vs 74.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 vs 1070.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 vs 6.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 vs 89.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 vs 436.958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 vs 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 vs 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 vs 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3351 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 575
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon Pro 575 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30276 | 34797 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | 86.154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | 1090.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | 7.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | 98.349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | 539.686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | 9613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 | 2814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 | 9613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 | 2814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3352 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
Startdatum | 5 June 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 436 | 496 |
Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1105 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | 1096 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 3,584 gflops | 4,506 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 1792 | 2048 |
Texturfüllrate | 112.0 GTexel / s | 140.8 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 217.6 GB / s | 217.6 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 6800 MHz | 6800 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |