AMD Radeon Pro 570 versus AMD Radeon Pro 575
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon Pro 570 and AMD Radeon Pro 575 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro 575
- Environ 10% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1096 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- Environ 26% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 140.8 GTexel / s versus 112.0 GTexel / s
- Environ 14% de pipelines plus haut: 2048 versus 1792
- Environ 26% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,506 gflops versus 3,584 gflops
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 34797 versus 30276
- Environ 15% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 86.154 versus 74.958
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1090.128 versus 1070.209
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.88 versus 6.94
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.349 versus 89.457
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 539.686 versus 436.958
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9613 versus 7664
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 2814 versus 2340
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9613 versus 7664
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 2814 versus 2340
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1096 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 140.8 GTexel / s versus 112.0 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2048 versus 1792 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,506 gflops versus 3,584 gflops |
Référence | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34797 versus 30276 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 86.154 versus 74.958 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1090.128 versus 1070.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.88 versus 6.94 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.349 versus 89.457 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 539.686 versus 436.958 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9613 versus 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2814 versus 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 versus 3351 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9613 versus 7664 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2814 versus 2340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 versus 3351 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon Pro 570
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro 575
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon Pro 575 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6337 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 697 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 30276 | 34797 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 74.958 | 86.154 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1070.209 | 1090.128 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 6.94 | 7.88 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 89.457 | 98.349 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 436.958 | 539.686 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7664 | 9613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2340 | 2814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3351 | 3352 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7664 | 9613 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2340 | 2814 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3351 | 3352 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
AMD Radeon Pro 570 | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 4.0 |
Nom de code | Polaris 20 | Polaris 20 |
Date de sortie | 5 June 2017 | 5 June 2017 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 436 | 496 |
Genre | Workstation | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1105 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1000 MHz | 1096 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 3,584 gflops | 4,506 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 1792 | 2048 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 112.0 GTexel / s | 140.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 120 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 5,700 million | 5,700 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 241 mm | 241 mm |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | None |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_0) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 217.6 GB / s | 217.6 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6800 MHz | 6800 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |