AMD Radeon R7 M370 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon R7 M370 und AMD Radeon R9 280X Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R7 M370
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- Um etwa 33% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 3 GB
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 5 May 2015 vs 8 October 2013 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 3 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 vs 675 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Etwa 4% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1000 MHz vs 960 MHz
- 5.6x mehr Texturfüllrate: 128.0 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s
- 5.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2048 vs 384
- 5.6x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 4,096 gflops vs 737.3 gflops
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6138 vs 1418
- 5.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 89.187 vs 17.26
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1434.496 vs 476.075
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 7.656 vs 1.653
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 87.459 vs 30.082
- 7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 493.57 vs 70.174
- 5.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9603 vs 1747
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3700 vs 1484
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3357 vs 2449
- 5.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9603 vs 1747
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3700 vs 1484
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3357 vs 2449
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1000 MHz vs 960 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 128.0 GTexel / s vs 23.04 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 2048 vs 384 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4,096 gflops vs 737.3 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 6138 vs 1418 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 89.187 vs 17.26 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1434.496 vs 476.075 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 7.656 vs 1.653 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 87.459 vs 30.082 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 493.57 vs 70.174 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9603 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3700 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 vs 2449 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9603 vs 1747 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3700 vs 1484 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 vs 2449 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon R7 M370
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 280X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon R7 M370 | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1418 | 6138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 676 | 675 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7070 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 17.26 | 89.187 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 476.075 | 1434.496 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.653 | 7.656 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.082 | 87.459 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 70.174 | 493.57 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1747 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1484 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2449 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1747 | 9603 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1484 | 3700 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2449 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2351 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon R7 M370 | AMD Radeon R9 280X | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
Codename | Litho | Tahiti |
Design | AMD Radeon R7 300 Series | AMD Radeon R9 200 Series |
Startdatum | 5 May 2015 | 8 October 2013 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 933 | 372 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 960 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 900 MHz | |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 737.3 gflops | 4,096 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 2048 |
Texturfüllrate | 23.04 GTexel / s | 128.0 GTexel / s |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,040 million | 4,313 million |
Stream Processors | 2048 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 250 Watt | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Eyefinity | ||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | |
Länge | 275 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 6-pin + 1 x 8-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 73.6 GB / s | 288 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 bit | 384 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PCIe 3.0 | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
Zero Core | ||
ZeroCore | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
CrossFire | ||
DDMA audio | ||
LiquidVR | ||
TressFX | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) |