AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Vergleichende Analyse von AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT und AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 10 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 34% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- Etwa 25% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1530 MHz
- Etwa 2% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 225 Watt vs 230 Watt
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16670 vs 13932
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 815
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 77150 vs 69812
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 vs 171.616
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 vs 16.925
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 247.788
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 vs 1195.863
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 vs 13044
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 vs 13044
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1530 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt vs 230 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16670 vs 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77150 vs 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 vs 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 vs 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 247.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 vs 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 vs 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 vs 13044 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 vs 3949.565
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3720
- 9.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3369
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3720
- 9.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3369
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 vs 3949.565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 vs 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 vs 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 vs 3369 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16670 | 13932 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 815 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 77150 | 69812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 171.616 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 4031.404 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 16.925 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 247.788 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1195.863 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 30936 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 13044 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 7164 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 30936 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9488 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
Startdatum | 7 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $400 | $999 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 148 | 118 |
Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Jetzt kaufen | $999 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Render output units | 64 | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 225 Watt | 230 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
Vulkan | ||
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
VR Ready |