AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparative analysis of AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G2D Mark, PassMark - G3D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
  • Around 34% higher core clock speed: 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz
  • Around 25% higher boost clock speed: 1905 MHz vs 1530 MHz
  • Around 2% lower typical power consumption: 225 Watt vs 230 Watt
  • Around 22% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 13307 vs 10925
  • Around 59% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 297010 vs 186736
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 7 July 2019 vs 13 August 2018
Core clock speed 1605 MHz vs 1200 MHz
Boost clock speed 1905 MHz vs 1530 MHz
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt vs 230 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 13307 vs 10925
Geekbench - OpenCL 297010 vs 186736

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

  • Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 796 vs 763
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 13044 vs 11754
  • Around 11% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 13044 vs 11754
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 vs 3713
  • Around 93% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 vs 3713
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 vs 3354
  • 9.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 vs 3354
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 796 vs 763
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 13044 vs 11754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 13044 vs 11754
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 7164 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 7164 vs 3713
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 30936 vs 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 30936 vs 3354

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
763
796
PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
13307
10925
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
297010
186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11754
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
11754
13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3713
7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3354
30936
Name AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
PassMark - G2D Mark 763 796
PassMark - G3D Mark 13307 10925
Geekbench - OpenCL 297010 186736
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 11754 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 11754 13044
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3713 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3713 7164
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3354 30936
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3354 30936
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 171.616
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 4031.404
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 16.925
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 247.788
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 1195.863

Compare specifications (specs)

AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200

Essentials

Architecture RDNA GCN 5.0
Code name Navi 10 Vega 10
Launch date 7 July 2019 13 August 2018
Launch price (MSRP) $400 $999
Place in performance rating 48 7
Type Desktop Workstation
Price now $999
Value for money (0-100) 13.37

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1905 MHz 1530 MHz
Compute units 40
Core clock speed 1605 MHz 1200 MHz
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 19.51 TFLOPs
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance 9.75 TFLOPs
Pixel fill rate 121.9 GP/s
Render output units 64
Stream Processors 2560
Texture fill rate 304.8 GT/s
Texture Units 160
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 225 Watt 230 Watt
Transistor count 10.3 B 12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology 14 nm

Video outputs and ports

DisplayPort support
HDMI
Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Recommended system power (PSU) 600 Watt
Supplementary power connectors 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
Length 267 mm

API support

DirectX 12 12.0 (12_1)
Vulkan
OpenGL 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 8 GB
Memory bandwidth 448 GB/s
Memory bus width 256 bit
Memory type GDDR6
Memory clock speed 2000 MHz

Technologies

4K H264 Decode
4K H264 Encode
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready
FreeSync
H265/HEVC Decode
H265/HEVC Encode
HDMI 4K Support
TrueAudio
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR)
VR Ready