AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT versus AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Comparaison des cartes vidéo AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT and AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 10 mois plus tard
- Environ 34% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1605 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- Environ 25% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1530 MHz
- Environ 2% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 225 Watt versus 230 Watt
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 16667 versus 13932
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 815
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 77153 versus 69812
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 252.601 versus 171.616
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.769 versus 16.925
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 247.788
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1322.129 versus 1195.863
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14699 versus 13044
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14699 versus 13044
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 versus 13 August 2018 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1530 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt versus 230 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16667 versus 13932 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 815 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 versus 69812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 versus 171.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 versus 16.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 247.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 versus 1195.863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 versus 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 versus 13044 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4031.404 versus 3949.565
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7164 versus 3720
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 30936 versus 3369
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7164 versus 3720
- 9.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 30936 versus 3369
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4031.404 versus 3949.565 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 7164 versus 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 30936 versus 3369 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 7164 versus 3720 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 30936 versus 3369 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 16667 | 13932 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 | 815 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 77153 | 69812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 252.601 | 171.616 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3949.565 | 4031.404 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.769 | 16.925 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 | 247.788 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1322.129 | 1195.863 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14699 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 | 30936 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14699 | 13044 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 | 7164 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 | 30936 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9486 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | RDNA | GCN 5.0 |
| Nom de code | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Date de sortie | 7 July 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $400 | $999 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 148 | 118 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
| Prix maintenant | $999 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 13.37 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz | 1530 MHz |
| Unités de Compute | 40 | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
| Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Stream Processors | 2560 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | |
| Texture Units | 160 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 225 Watt | 230 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 10.3 B | 12,500 million |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 4x mini-DisplayPort | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 600 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenGL | 4.6 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 2000 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 4K H264 Decode | ||
| 4K H264 Encode | ||
| DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
| FreeSync | ||
| H265/HEVC Decode | ||
| H265/HEVC Encode | ||
| HDMI 4K Support | ||
| TrueAudio | ||
| Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT avec des autres
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIATITAN V
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2060 Super
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5700X
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
AMDRadeon RX 6600M
AMDRadeon RX 5700 XT vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 1010
