Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs Intel HD Graphics P4600
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel HD Graphics 4600 und Intel HD Graphics P4600 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Etwa 14% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:400 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Etwa 87% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 45 Watt vs 84 Watt
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 506
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 146.479
- Etwa 86% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 vs 6.64
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 400 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 84 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 vs 506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 vs 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 vs 6.64 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 vs 314
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3376 vs 3210
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.915 vs 8.844
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.178 vs 1.115
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.689 vs 10.385
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 vs 1702
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 2808
- Etwa 96% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 vs 1702
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 2808
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 vs 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3376 vs 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 vs 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 vs 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 vs 10.385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 2808 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 506 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 491 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 3376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3345 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Generation 7.5 | Generation 7.5 |
| Codename | Haswell GT2 | Haswell GT2 |
| Startdatum | 3 June 2013 | 1 June 2013 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1359 | 995 |
| Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1250 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 400 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 50 gflops | |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 20 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 5 GTexel / s | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 392 million | 392 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 1.0 x16 | IGP |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Speicher |
||
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Technologien |
||
| Quick Sync | ||


