Intel HD Graphics 4600 vs Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 4600 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Around 14% higher core clock speed: 400 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Around 87% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 84 Watt
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 vs 506
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 vs 146.479
- Around 86% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 vs 6.64
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz vs 350 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 84 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 vs 506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 vs 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 vs 6.64 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Around 56% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 vs 314
- Around 5% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3376 vs 3210
- Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.915 vs 8.844
- Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.178 vs 1.115
- Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.689 vs 10.385
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 vs 1702
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 vs 2808
- Around 96% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 vs 1702
- Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 vs 2808
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 vs 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3376 vs 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 vs 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 vs 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 vs 10.385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 vs 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 vs 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 vs 2808 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 506 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 491 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 3376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3345 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Generation 7.5 |
| Code name | Haswell GT2 | Haswell GT2 |
| Launch date | 3 June 2013 | 1 June 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1359 | 995 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1250 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 400 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 50 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | |
| Texture fill rate | 5 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Transistor count | 392 million | 392 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | IGP |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||


