Intel HD Graphics 4600 versus Intel HD Graphics P4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel HD Graphics 4600 and Intel HD Graphics P4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 14% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 400 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 87% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 84 Watt
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 630 versus 506
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 171.17 versus 146.479
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 12.361 versus 6.64
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 84 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 versus 506 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 versus 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 versus 6.64 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics P4600
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 491 versus 314
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 3376 versus 3210
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.915 versus 8.844
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.178 versus 1.115
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 10.689 versus 10.385
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3342 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3345 versus 2808
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3342 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3345 versus 2808
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 491 versus 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3376 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.915 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.178 versus 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.689 versus 10.385 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3342 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3345 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3342 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3345 versus 2808 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 4600
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics P4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 630 | 506 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 314 | 491 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3210 | 3376 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.844 | 8.915 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 171.17 | 146.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.115 | 1.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 10.385 | 10.689 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 12.361 | 6.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1702 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2808 | 3345 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 988 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1702 | 3342 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2808 | 3345 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel HD Graphics 4600 | Intel HD Graphics P4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 7.5 | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | Haswell GT2 | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 3 June 2013 | 1 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1359 | 995 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1250 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 400 MHz | 350 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 50 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 20 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 5 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 84 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 392 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | IGP |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.3 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||


