Intel HD Graphics 520 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel HD Graphics 520 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 520
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 6 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 60 Watt
- 16x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 32 GB vs 2 GB
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 326 vs 117
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2015 vs 18 February 2014 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 60 Watt |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 32 GB vs 2 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 vs 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 vs 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 vs 117 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
- 3.4x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Etwa 3% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1085 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- 26.7x mehr Leitungssysteme: 640 vs 24
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3901 vs 864
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 521 vs 209
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11526 vs 3993
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 42.463 vs 21.852
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 642.715 vs 143.083
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.933 vs 1.243
- 2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 26.532 vs 12.958
- 4.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 133.458 vs 28.182
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4843 vs 951
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3683 vs 1462
- 5.1x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4843 vs 951
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3683 vs 1462
| Spezifikationen | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1020 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1085 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Leitungssysteme | 640 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3901 vs 864 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 521 vs 209 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 11526 vs 3993 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 42.463 vs 21.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 642.715 vs 143.083 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.933 vs 1.243 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 26.532 vs 12.958 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 133.458 vs 28.182 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4843 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3683 vs 1462 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4843 vs 951 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3683 vs 1462 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 520
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 864 | 3901 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 209 | 521 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3993 | 11526 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 21.852 | 42.463 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.083 | 642.715 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.243 | 2.933 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 12.958 | 26.532 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.182 | 133.458 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 951 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1462 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3337 | 3329 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 951 | 4843 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1462 | 3683 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3337 | 3329 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 326 | 117 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel HD Graphics 520 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Generation 9.0 | Maxwell |
| Codename | Skylake GT2 | GM107 |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2015 | 18 February 2014 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1381 | 707 |
| Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $149 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $299.01 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 15.02 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1050 MHz | 1085 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 1020 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 24 | 640 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 1,870 million |
| CUDA-Kerne | 640 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,389 gflops | |
| Texturfüllrate | 43.4 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One mini... |
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Länge | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | 2 GB |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Speichertyp | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / DDR4 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | 0 |
| Speicherbandbreite | 86.4 GB / s | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 5.4 GB/s | |
Technologien |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche Intel HD Graphics 520 mit anderen
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
ATIMobility Radeon 7500
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelHD Graphics
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon R7 M340
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 910M
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 620
IntelHD Graphics 520 vs
AMDRadeon HD 8370D IGP
