Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 und Intel UHD Graphics 630 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- 1833.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 16x mehr Leitungssysteme: 384 vs 24
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 10 nm vs 14 nm
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 1237
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 299
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 4657
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 27.517
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 354.254
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 1.807
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 20.323
- 6.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 29.327
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 1870
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3309
- 3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 1870
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3309
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 2 Sep 2020 vs 1 September 2017 |
Texturfüllrate | 52.80 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 384 vs 24 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 10 nm vs 14 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 vs 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 vs 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 vs 3309 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Etwa 9% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2666 | 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 383 | 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11991 | 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 79.859 | 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1137.615 | 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.569 | 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 61.688 | 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 192.566 | 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 5609 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3708 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 5609 | 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3708 | 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Generation 12.0 | Generation 9.5 |
Codename | Tiger Lake GT1 | Coffee Lake GT2 |
Startdatum | 2 Sep 2020 | 1 September 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 594 | 1234 |
Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1100 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Berechnungseinheiten | 48 | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 300 MHz | 350 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 10 nm | 14 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 211.2 GFLOPS | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 1.690 TFLOPS | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 844.8 GFLOPS | |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 24 |
Pixel fill rate | 13.20 GPixel/s | |
Texturfüllrate | 52.80 GTexel/s | 28.8 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops | |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Breite | IGP | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenCL | 2.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |