Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 vs Intel UHD Graphics 630

Comparative analysis of Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4 and Intel UHD Graphics 630 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• 1833.3x more texture fill rate: 52.80 GTexel/s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
• 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 10 nm vs 14 nm
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2666 vs 1237
• Around 28% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 383 vs 299
• 2.6x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11991 vs 4657
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 79.859 vs 27.517
• 3.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1137.615 vs 354.254
• 2.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.569 vs 1.807
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 61.688 vs 20.323
• 6.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 192.566 vs 29.327
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 5609 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3708 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3356 vs 3309
• 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 5609 vs 1870
• 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3708 vs 1596
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3356 vs 3309

Reasons to consider the Intel UHD Graphics 630

• Around 17% higher core clock speed: 350 MHz vs 300 MHz
• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 1100 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: Intel Iris Xe Graphics G4
GPU 2: Intel UHD Graphics 630

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	2666 1237
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	383 299
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11991 4657
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	79.859 27.517
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1137.615 354.254
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.569 1.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	61.688 20.323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	192.566 29.327
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3309
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5609 1870
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3708 1596
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3356 3309

Compare specifications (specs)