Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs AMD Radeon RX 550
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics 630 und AMD Radeon RX 550 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 4 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 1% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1200 MHz vs 1183 MHz
- 384x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 460.8 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs
- 3.3x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1596 vs 940
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3309 vs 2158
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1596 vs 940
- Etwa 53% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3309 vs 2158
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 1 September 2017 vs 18 April 2017 |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 1183 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops vs 1.2 TFLOPs |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 vs 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 vs 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 vs 2158 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 550
- 3.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Etwa 31% höhere Texturfüllrate: 37.86 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 21.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 512 vs 24
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2690 vs 1237
- Etwa 59% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 476 vs 299
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 11610 vs 4657
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 33.507 vs 27.517
- 2.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1037.305 vs 354.254
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.064 vs 1.807
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 52.533 vs 20.323
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 140.911 vs 29.327
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 4485 vs 1870
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 4485 vs 1870
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 127 vs 68
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1100 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 37.86 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 512 vs 24 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 2690 vs 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 476 vs 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 11610 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 33.507 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1037.305 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.064 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 52.533 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 140.911 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 4485 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 4485 vs 1870 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 127 vs 68 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 550
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon RX 550 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 2690 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 476 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 11610 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 33.507 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 1037.305 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 3.064 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 52.533 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 140.911 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 2158 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 4485 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 940 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 2158 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 127 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | AMD Radeon RX 550 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Generation 9.5 | GCN 4.0 |
Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | Lexa |
Startdatum | 1 September 2017 | 18 April 2017 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1234 | 876 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | Radeon RX 500 Series | |
GCN-Generierung | 4th Gen | |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $79 | |
Jetzt kaufen | $75 | |
Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 59.51 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | 1183 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz | 1100 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops | 1.2 TFLOPs |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 24 | 512 |
Texturfüllrate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 37.86 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 2,200 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
VGA | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Länge | 145 mm | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 400 Watt | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 bit |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 112 GB/s | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 7000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
AMD Radeon™ Chill | ||
AMD Radeon™ ReLive | ||
AppAcceleration | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
LiquidVR | ||
PowerTune | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Unified Video Decoder (UVD) | ||
Video Code Engine (VCE) | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |