Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs Intel HD Graphics 620
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics 630 und Intel HD Graphics 620 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 0 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 17% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:350 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Etwa 14% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz
- Etwa 14% höhere Texturfüllrate: 28.8 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s
- Etwa 14% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 460.8 gflops vs 403.2 gflops
- Etwa 34% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1237 vs 922
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 299 vs 216
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4657 vs 4178
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 27.517 vs 24.275
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 354.254 vs 227.879
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.807 vs 1.508
- Etwa 30% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.323 vs 15.582
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1870 vs 1404
- Etwa 33% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1870 vs 1404
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2017 vs 30 August 2016 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz vs 1050 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 28.8 GTexel / s vs 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops vs 403.2 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 vs 922 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 vs 216 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 vs 4178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 vs 24.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 vs 227.879 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 vs 1.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 vs 15.582 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 vs 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 vs 1404 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel HD Graphics 620
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 30.288 vs 29.327
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1733 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3309
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1733 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3309
- 5x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 343 vs 68
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 30.288 vs 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1733 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1733 vs 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 343 vs 68 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 620
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 620 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 922 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 216 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 4178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 24.275 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 227.879 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 1.508 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 15.582 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 30.288 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 1404 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 1733 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 343 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | Intel HD Graphics 620 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Generation 9.5 | Generation 9.5 |
| Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | Kaby Lake GT2 |
| Startdatum | 1 September 2017 | 30 August 2016 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1234 | 1334 |
| Typ | Desktop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | 1050 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops | 403.2 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 24 | 24 |
| Texturfüllrate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 25.2 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 189 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | 1 |
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 32 GB | |
| Speichertyp | DDR3L / LPDDR3 / LPDDR4 | |
Technologien |
||
| Quick Sync | ||


