Intel UHD Graphics 630 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Vergleichende Analyse von Intel UHD Graphics 630 und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der Intel UHD Graphics 630
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 1 Monat(e) später
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 14 nm vs 16 nm
- 8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 15 Watt vs 120 Watt
Startdatum | 1 September 2017 vs 19 July 2016 |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm vs 16 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- 4.3x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1506 MHz vs 350 MHz
- Etwa 42% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1709 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 4.7x mehr Texturfüllrate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s
- 53.3x mehr Leitungssysteme: 1280 vs 24
- 9.5x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 4,375 gflops vs 460.8 gflops
- 8.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 vs 1237
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 vs 299
- 7.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 vs 4657
- 4.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 vs 27.517
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 vs 354.254
- 4.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 vs 1.807
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.766 vs 20.323
- 15.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 vs 29.327
- 6.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 vs 1870
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 vs 3309
- 6.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 vs 1870
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 vs 1596
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 vs 3309
- 13.3x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 907 vs 68
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1506 MHz vs 350 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1709 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 136.7 GTexel / s vs 28.8 GTexel / s |
Leitungssysteme | 1280 vs 24 |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4,375 gflops vs 460.8 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 vs 1237 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 vs 299 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 vs 4657 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 vs 27.517 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 vs 354.254 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 vs 1.807 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.766 vs 20.323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 vs 29.327 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 vs 3309 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 vs 1870 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 vs 1596 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 vs 3309 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 907 vs 68 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 10079 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 747 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 35369 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 119.148 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 1373.562 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 8.694 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 21.766 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 454.799 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3340 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 12442 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3691 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3340 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 907 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
Codename | Coffee Lake GT2 | GP106 |
Startdatum | 1 September 2017 | 19 July 2016 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1234 | 356 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $299 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1200 MHz | 1709 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 350 MHz | 1506 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 460.8 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 14 nm | 16 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 24 | 1280 |
Texturfüllrate | 28.8 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 189 million | 4,400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 250 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 1 | |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 192.2 GB / s | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8008 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Technologien |
||
Quick Sync |