Intel UHD Graphics 630 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
Comparaison des cartes vidéo Intel UHD Graphics 630 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le Intel UHD Graphics 630
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- 8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 120 Watt
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 versus 19 July 2016 |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
- 4.3x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1506 MHz versus 350 MHz
- Environ 42% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1709 MHz versus 1200 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 136.7 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s
- 53.3x plus de pipelines: 1280 versus 24
- 9.5x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,375 gflops versus 460.8 gflops
- 8.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 10079 versus 1237
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 747 versus 299
- 7.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 35369 versus 4657
- 4.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 119.148 versus 27.517
- 3.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1373.562 versus 354.254
- 4.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.694 versus 1.807
- Environ 7% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.766 versus 20.323
- 15.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 454.799 versus 29.327
- 6.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12442 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3691 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3340 versus 3309
- 6.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12442 versus 1870
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3691 versus 1596
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3340 versus 3309
- 13.3x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 907 versus 68
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1506 MHz versus 350 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1709 MHz versus 1200 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 136.7 GTexel / s versus 28.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 1280 versus 24 |
| Performance á point flottant | 4,375 gflops versus 460.8 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10079 versus 1237 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 747 versus 299 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 35369 versus 4657 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 119.148 versus 27.517 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1373.562 versus 354.254 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.694 versus 1.807 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 21.766 versus 20.323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 454.799 versus 29.327 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12442 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 versus 3309 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12442 versus 1870 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 versus 1596 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 versus 3309 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 907 versus 68 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: Intel UHD Graphics 630
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1237 | 10079 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 299 | 747 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4657 | 35369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 27.517 | 119.148 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 354.254 | 1373.562 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.807 | 8.694 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.323 | 21.766 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 29.327 | 454.799 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1870 | 12442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1596 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3309 | 3340 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1870 | 12442 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1596 | 3691 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3309 | 3340 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 68 | 907 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| Intel UHD Graphics 630 | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Generation 9.5 | Pascal |
| Nom de code | Coffee Lake GT2 | GP106 |
| Date de sortie | 1 September 2017 | 19 July 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1234 | 356 |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $299 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1200 MHz | 1709 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 350 MHz | 1506 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 460.8 gflops | 4,375 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 16 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 1280 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 28.8 GTexel / s | 136.7 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 120 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 189 million | 4,400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 250 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Mémoire |
||
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 / 128 Bit | 192 Bit |
| Mémoire partagé | 1 | |
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer Intel UHD Graphics 630 avec des autres
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
ATIRadeon 9200 PRO
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon HD 6550D
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon R7 240
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 840M
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
IntelUHD Graphics 617
IntelUHD Graphics 630 vs
AMDRadeon 680M
