NVIDIA GeForce 930M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce 930M und NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Jahr(e) 9 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 8% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:928 MHz vs 863 MHz
- Etwa 5% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 941 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 7.6x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 33 Watt vs 250 Watt
| Startdatum | 13 March 2015 vs 23 May 2013 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 928 MHz vs 863 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 941 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 33 Watt vs 250 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- 7.1x mehr Texturfüllrate: 160.5 billion / sec vs 22.58 GTexel / s
- 6x mehr Leitungssysteme: 2304 vs 384
- 5.8x bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 4,156 gflops vs 722.7 gflops
- Um etwa 50% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 3 GB vs 2 GB
- 3.3x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 7.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 vs 1012
- 3.9x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 vs 150
- 4.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 23233 vs 5258
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 57.735 vs 22.344
- 7.6x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 vs 166.907
- 4.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.505 vs 1.225
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.407 vs 19.899
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.323 vs 84.246
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 vs 1987
- 4.6x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 vs 1987
| Spezifikationen | |
| Texturfüllrate | 160.5 billion / sec vs 22.58 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 2304 vs 384 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 4,156 gflops vs 722.7 gflops |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 3 GB vs 2 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 6008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7986 vs 1012 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 vs 150 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 23233 vs 5258 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 vs 22.344 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 vs 166.907 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 vs 1.225 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 vs 19.899 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 vs 84.246 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 vs 1987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 vs 1987 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 3706 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3356 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1012 | 7986 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 590 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 5258 | 23233 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.344 | 57.735 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.907 | 1269.688 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.225 | 5.505 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.899 | 37.407 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.246 | 174.323 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1987 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1987 | 9064 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 2777 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce 930M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Codename | GM108 | GK110 |
| Startdatum | 13 March 2015 | 23 May 2013 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1202 | 451 |
| Typ | Laptop | Desktop |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $649 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $740.99 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 941 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 928 MHz | 863 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 722.7 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 384 | 2304 |
| Texturfüllrate | 22.58 GTexel / s | 160.5 billion / sec |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 33 Watt | 250 Watt |
| CUDA-Kerne | 2304 | |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 95 °C | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 7,080 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
| Höhe | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
| Länge | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
| Minimale empfohlene Systemleistung | 600 Watt | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 3 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 14.4 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1800 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Speichertyp | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Gaming | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision Live | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Blu Ray 3D | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| TXAA | ||
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche NVIDIA GeForce 930M mit anderen
NVIDIAGeForce 930M vs
IntelIris Graphics 5100
NVIDIAGeForce 930M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8670D
NVIDIAGeForce 930M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 830M
NVIDIAGeForce 930M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920A
NVIDIAGeForce 930M vs
IntelHD Graphics P530
NVIDIAGeForce 930M vs
AMDRadeon R5 430 OEM
