NVIDIA GeForce 930M versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce 930M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce 930M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 9 mois plus tard
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 928 MHz versus 863 MHz
- Environ 5% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 941 MHz versus 900 MHz
- 7.6x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 33 Watt versus 250 Watt
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 versus 23 May 2013 |
Vitesse du noyau | 928 MHz versus 863 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 941 MHz versus 900 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt versus 250 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 160.5 billion / sec versus 22.58 GTexel / s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 2304 versus 384
- 5.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 4,156 gflops versus 722.7 gflops
- Environ 50% plus de taille maximale de mémoire: 3 GB versus 2 GB
- 3.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 7.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 7986 versus 1012
- 3.9x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 590 versus 150
- 4.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 23233 versus 5258
- 2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 57.735 versus 22.344
- 7.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1269.688 versus 166.907
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.505 versus 1.225
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 37.407 versus 19.899
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 174.323 versus 84.246
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 9064 versus 1987
- 4.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 9064 versus 1987
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 160.5 billion / sec versus 22.58 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 2304 versus 384 |
Performance á point flottant | 4,156 gflops versus 722.7 gflops |
Taille de mémore maximale | 3 GB versus 2 GB |
Vitesse de mémoire | 6008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 7986 versus 1012 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 590 versus 150 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 23233 versus 5258 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 57.735 versus 22.344 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1269.688 versus 166.907 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.505 versus 1.225 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 37.407 versus 19.899 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 174.323 versus 84.246 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9064 versus 1987 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3356 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9064 versus 1987 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 3706 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3356 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce 930M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce 930M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1012 | 7986 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 150 | 590 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 5258 | 23233 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 22.344 | 57.735 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 166.907 | 1269.688 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.225 | 5.505 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.899 | 37.407 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 84.246 | 174.323 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1987 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3706 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3356 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1987 | 9064 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3706 | 3714 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3356 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 | 2777 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce 930M | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
Nom de code | GM108 | GK110 |
Date de sortie | 13 March 2015 | 23 May 2013 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1202 | 451 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $649 | |
Prix maintenant | $740.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 12.94 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 941 MHz | 900 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 928 MHz | 863 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 722.7 gflops | 4,156 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 2304 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 22.58 GTexel / s | 160.5 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 33 Watt | 250 Watt |
Noyaux CUDA | 2304 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
Compte de transistor | 7,080 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI..., 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | One 8-pin and one 6-pin |
Hauteur | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 10.5" (26.7 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme minimum recommandé | 600 Watt | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 2 GB | 3 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 384 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1800 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus | ||
3D Gaming | ||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision Live | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
Blu Ray 3D | ||
FXAA | ||
PhysX | ||
TXAA |