NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs AMD Radeon R5 M230
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 und AMD Radeon R5 M230 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 16% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:954 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Etwa 49% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 417
- Etwa 66% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 128
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 27 March 2014 vs 7 January 2014 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 128 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Etwa 12% höhere Texturfüllrate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- Etwa 67% höhere Leitungssysteme: 320 vs 192
- Etwa 49% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 547.2 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 2x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1000x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 1000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 vs 1946
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.593 vs 6.705
- Etwa 43% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.386 vs 100.391
- Etwa 93% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.852 vs 0.441
- Etwa 94% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 vs 8.146
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 vs 20.64
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 985 vs 977
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 1494
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2401 vs 1833
- Etwa 1% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 985 vs 977
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 1494
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 vs 1833
| Spezifikationen | |
| Texturfüllrate | 17.1 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 320 vs 192 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 547.2 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 vs 1946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 vs 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 vs 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 vs 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 vs 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 vs 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 vs 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 vs 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 vs 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 vs 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 vs 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 vs 1833 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 128 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 4596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 15.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 2401 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Codename | GK208B | Jet |
| Startdatum | 27 March 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1488 | 1445 |
| Jetzt kaufen | $34.99 | |
| Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 23.15 | |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technische Info |
||
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 954 MHz | 825 MHz |
| CUDA-Kerne | 192 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 366.3 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 95 °C | |
| Leitungssysteme | 192 | 320 |
| Texturfüllrate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 19 Watt | |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 292 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 855 MHz | |
| Berechnungseinheiten | 5 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Audioeingang für HDMI | Internal | |
| Display-Anschlüsse | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximale VGA-Auflösung | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Höhe | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Länge | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 14.4 GB / s | 16 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1.8 GB/s | 1000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
