NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 vs AMD Radeon R5 M230
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
- Around 16% higher core clock speed: 954 MHz vs 825 MHz
- Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 vs 417
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 vs 128
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 27 March 2014 vs 7 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz vs 825 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 vs 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 vs 128 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Around 12% higher texture fill rate: 17.1 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 320 vs 192
- Around 49% better floating-point performance: 547.2 gflops vs 366.3 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
- 1000x more memory clock speed: 1000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s
- 2.4x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 vs 1946
- Around 28% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.593 vs 6.705
- Around 43% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.386 vs 100.391
- Around 93% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.852 vs 0.441
- Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 vs 8.146
- 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 vs 20.64
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 985 vs 977
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 vs 1494
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2401 vs 1833
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 985 vs 977
- Around 29% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 vs 1494
- Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 vs 1833
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Texture fill rate | 17.1 GTexel / s vs 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 547.2 gflops vs 366.3 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz vs 1.8 GB/s |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 vs 1946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 vs 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 vs 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 vs 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 vs 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 vs 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 vs 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 vs 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 vs 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 vs 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 vs 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 vs 1833 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 128 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 4596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 15.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 2401 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GK208B | Jet |
| Launch date | 27 March 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1488 | 1445 |
| Price now | $34.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 23.15 | |
| Design | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 825 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 366.3 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.26 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 292 million | 1,040 million |
| Boost clock speed | 855 MHz | |
| Compute units | 5 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Height | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 16 GB/s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1.8 GB/s | 1000 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Switchable graphics | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
