NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 versus AMD Radeon R5 M230
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 and AMD Radeon R5 M230 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 954 MHz versus 825 MHz
- Environ 49% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 623 versus 417
- Environ 66% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 212 versus 128
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 versus 7 January 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz versus 825 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 versus 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 versus 128 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M230
- Environ 12% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 17.1 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 320 versus 192
- Environ 49% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 547.2 gflops versus 366.3 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 1000x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1000 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s
- 2.4x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4596 versus 1946
- Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 8.593 versus 6.705
- Environ 43% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 143.386 versus 100.391
- Environ 93% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.852 versus 0.441
- Environ 94% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 15.789 versus 8.146
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 49.196 versus 20.64
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 985 versus 977
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 1927 versus 1494
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 2401 versus 1833
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 985 versus 977
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1927 versus 1494
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2401 versus 1833
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 17.1 GTexel / s versus 15.26 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 320 versus 192 |
| Performance á point flottant | 547.2 gflops versus 366.3 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1000 MHz versus 1.8 GB/s |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4596 versus 1946 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 8.593 versus 6.705 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 143.386 versus 100.391 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.852 versus 0.441 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 15.789 versus 8.146 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 49.196 versus 20.64 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 985 versus 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1927 versus 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2401 versus 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 985 versus 977 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1927 versus 1494 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2401 versus 1833 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 710
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M230
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 623 | 417 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 212 | 128 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1946 | 4596 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 6.705 | 8.593 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 100.391 | 143.386 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.441 | 0.852 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.146 | 15.789 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.64 | 49.196 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 977 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 1494 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1833 | 2401 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 977 | 985 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1494 | 1927 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1833 | 2401 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 192 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 710 | AMD Radeon R5 M230 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GK208B | Jet |
| Date de sortie | 27 March 2014 | 7 January 2014 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $34.99 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1488 | 1445 |
| Prix maintenant | $34.99 | |
| Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 23.15 | |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R5 200 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 954 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Noyaux CUDA | 192 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 366.3 gflops | 547.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Température maximale du GPU | 95 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 320 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 15.26 GTexel / s | 17.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 19 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 292 million | 1,040 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 855 MHz | |
| Unités de Compute | 5 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Contribution d’audio pour HDMI | Internal | |
| Connecteurs d’écran | Dual Link DVI-DHDMIVGA, 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | 2048x1536 | |
| Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Hauteur | 2.713" (6.9 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 11 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| Mantle | ||
| OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 14.4 GB / s | 16 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1.8 GB/s | 1000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| CUDA | ||
| FXAA | ||
| PhysX | ||
| PureVideo | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| AppAcceleration | ||
| DualGraphics | ||
| Enduro | ||
| HD3D | ||
| Powerplay | ||
| PowerTune | ||
| Graphiques changeables | ||
| ZeroCore | ||
