NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 und AMD Radeon R9 M390X Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 3 Jahr(e) 10 Monat(e) später
- 2.1x mehr Kerntaktfrequenz: 1530 MHz vs 723 MHz
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 12 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 11690 vs 3597
- Etwa 80% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 vs 435
- 2.6x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 57152 vs 22044
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.366 vs 64.199
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1892.505 vs 1284.053
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.492 vs 5.881
- Etwa 52% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.54 vs 78.169
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 vs 312.822
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 vs 6508
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 vs 6508
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 14 March 2019 vs 5 May 2015 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz vs 723 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm vs 28 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 vs 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 vs 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 vs 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 vs 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 vs 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 vs 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 vs 78.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 vs 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 vs 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 vs 6508 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Etwa 60% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 120 Watt
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 vs 3717
- 7.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 vs 3359
- 2.3x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 vs 3717
- 7.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 vs 3359
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 120 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 vs 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 vs 3359 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 | 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 | 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | 78.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 24690 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Codename | TU116 | Amethyst |
Startdatum | 14 March 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $219 | |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 241 | 303 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Design | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1785 MHz | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1530 MHz | 723 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 6,600 million | 5,000 million |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 2,961 gflops | |
Leitungssysteme | 2048 | |
Texturfüllrate | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
DisplayPort Anzahl | 1 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
HDMI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Länge | 229 mm | |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | None |
Busunterstützung | PCIe 3.0 | |
Laptop-Größe | large | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Speichertaktfrequenz | 8004 MHz | |
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | |
Speicherbandbreite | 160.0 GB / s | |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 | |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | |
Technologien |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Umschaltbare Grafiken | ||
ZeroCore |