NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 versus AMD Radeon R9 M390X
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 and AMD Radeon R9 M390X pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 10 mois plus tard
- 2.1x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1530 MHz versus 723 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 12 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 11690 versus 3597
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 782 versus 435
- 2.6x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 57152 versus 22044
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 190.366 versus 64.199
- Environ 47% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1892.505 versus 1284.053
- 2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 13.492 versus 5.881
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.54 versus 78.169
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 887.857 versus 312.822
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 14998 versus 6508
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 14998 versus 6508
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 versus 5 May 2015 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz versus 723 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm versus 28 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 versus 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 versus 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 versus 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 versus 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 versus 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 versus 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 versus 78.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 versus 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 versus 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 versus 6508 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R9 M390X
- Environ 60% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 120 Watt
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8593 versus 3717
- 7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 24690 versus 3359
- 2.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8593 versus 3717
- 7.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 24690 versus 3359
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 120 Watt |
Référence | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8593 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 24690 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8593 versus 3717 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 24690 versus 3359 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 M390X
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon R9 M390X |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11690 | 3597 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 782 | 435 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 57152 | 22044 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 190.366 | 64.199 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1892.505 | 1284.053 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 13.492 | 5.881 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.54 | 78.169 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 887.857 | 312.822 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 14998 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3717 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 24690 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 14998 | 6508 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3717 | 8593 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 24690 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5413 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 | AMD Radeon R9 M390X | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | GCN 3.0 |
Nom de code | TU116 | Amethyst |
Date de sortie | 14 March 2019 | 5 May 2015 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $219 | |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 241 | 303 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Conception | AMD Radeon R9 300 Series | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1785 MHz | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1530 MHz | 723 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 6,600 million | 5,000 million |
Performance á point flottant | 2,961 gflops | |
Pipelines | 2048 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 92.54 GTexel / s | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Compte DisplayPort | 1 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
HDMI | ||
Eyefinity | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Longeur | 229 mm | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
Mantle | ||
OpenCL | Not Listed | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
Vitesse de mémoire | 8004 MHz | |
RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 160.0 GB / s | |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
AMD Eyefinity | ||
DualGraphics | ||
FreeSync | ||
HD3D | ||
PowerTune | ||
Graphiques changeables | ||
ZeroCore |