NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M und NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 11 Monat(e) später
- 2.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 36.08 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s
- Etwa 67% höhere Leitungssysteme: 640 vs 384
- Etwa 53% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 1,155 gflops vs 752.6 gflops
- 3.2x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 vs 793
- Etwa 51% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 vs 149
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 vs 3866
- 4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 vs 9.392
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 vs 157.479
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 vs 0.864
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 vs 16.101
- 3.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 vs 44.77
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 vs 1589
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 vs 3235
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 vs 1589
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 vs 3235
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 vs 345
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 12 March 2014 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Texturfüllrate | 36.08 GTexel / s vs 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Leitungssysteme | 640 vs 384 |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,155 gflops vs 752.6 gflops |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 vs 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 vs 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 vs 3866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 vs 9.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 vs 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 vs 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 vs 16.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 vs 44.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 vs 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 vs 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 vs 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 vs 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 vs 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 vs 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 vs 345 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 | 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 | 3866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 9.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 16.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 44.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 345 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Codename | GM107 | GK107 |
| Startdatum | 12 March 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 896 | 1301 |
| Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
| CUDA-Kerne | 640 | |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,155 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 640 | 384 |
| Texturfüllrate | 36.08 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 980 MHz | |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 810 MHz | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| 7.1-Kanal HD-Audio auf HDMI | ||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) Unterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| eDP 1.2 Signalunterstützung | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| HDCP-Inhaltsschutz | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Unterstützung von LVDS-Signalen | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
| TrueHD und DTS-HD Audio Bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog Display-Unterstützung | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Busunterstützung | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop-Größe | medium sized | medium sized |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 80.0 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Speichertyp | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
| Standard-Speicherkonfiguration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1802 MHz | |
Technologien |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Navigation
Einen Grafikprozessor auswählen
Grafikkarten vergleichen
Vergleiche NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M mit anderen
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GS AGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon HD 3300 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
