NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 11 mois plus tard
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 36.08 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s
- Environ 67% de pipelines plus haut: 640 versus 384
- Environ 53% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,155 gflops versus 752.6 gflops
- 3.2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2521 versus 793
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 225 versus 149
- 2.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 9809 versus 3866
- 4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 37.761 versus 9.392
- 2.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 388.248 versus 157.479
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.428 versus 0.864
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 38.889 versus 16.101
- 3.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 151.016 versus 44.77
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3817 versus 1589
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3685 versus 3235
- 2.4x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3817 versus 1589
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3685 versus 3235
- 2.8x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 979 versus 345
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 versus 1 April 2013 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s versus 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 versus 384 |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops versus 752.6 gflops |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 versus 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 versus 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 versus 3866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 versus 9.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 versus 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 versus 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 versus 16.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 versus 44.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 versus 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 versus 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 versus 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 versus 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 versus 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 versus 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 versus 345 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 2521 | 793 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 225 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 9809 | 3866 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 37.761 | 9.392 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 388.248 | 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.428 | 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 38.889 | 16.101 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 151.016 | 44.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3817 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3353 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3817 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3353 | 3339 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 979 | 345 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GM107 | GK107 |
| Date de sortie | 12 March 2014 | 1 April 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 896 | 1301 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
| Performance á point flottant | 1,155 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 36.08 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | 1,270 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 980 MHz | |
| Vitesse du noyau | 810 MHz | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | Up to 3840x2160 |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | Up to 1920x1200 |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | Up to 2048x1536 |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | PCI Express 3.0 |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.0 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Genre de mémoire | DDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | DDR3 or GDDR5 | DDR3 / GDDR5 |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1802 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| Adaptive VSync | ||
| Ansel | ||
| BatteryBoost | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GeForce ShadowPlay | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
| TXAA | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 7800 GS AGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIRadeon HD 3300 IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3870 X2
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 810A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 950A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 850M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M375X
