NVIDIA GeForce MX130 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940M
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce MX130 und NVIDIA GeForce 940M Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Jahr(e) 8 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 5% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1122 MHz vs 1072 MHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1242 MHz vs 1176 MHz
- Etwa 6% höhere Texturfüllrate: 29.81 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s
- Etwa 6% bessere Gleitkomma-Leistung: 953.9 gflops vs 903.2 gflops
- Etwa 10% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 30 Watt vs 33 Watt
- 2.8x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1814 vs 1127
- Etwa 27% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 vs 154
- Etwa 8% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 6461 vs 5982
- Etwa 22% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 vs 25.98
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 406.203 vs 168.449
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 vs 1.307
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 vs 21.837
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 vs 101.399
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 vs 2132
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 vs 3065
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 vs 2132
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 vs 3065
- Etwa 25% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 632 vs 506
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 17 November 2017 vs 13 March 2015 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1122 MHz vs 1072 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1242 MHz vs 1176 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 29.81 GTexel / s vs 28.22 GTexel / s |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 953.9 gflops vs 903.2 gflops |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 33 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 vs 1127 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 vs 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 vs 5982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 vs 25.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 vs 168.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 vs 1.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 vs 21.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 vs 101.399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 vs 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 vs 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 vs 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 vs 3065 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 vs 506 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 1127 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 154 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 | 5982 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 25.98 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 168.449 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 1.307 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 21.837 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 101.399 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 2132 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3065 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 506 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Maxwell | Maxwell |
Codename | GM108 | GM108 |
Startdatum | 17 November 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 1013 | 1184 |
Typ | Laptop | Laptop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1242 MHz | 1176 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1122 MHz | 1072 MHz |
Gleitkomma-Leistung | 953.9 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 384 | 384 |
Texturfüllrate | 29.81 GTexel / s | 28.22 GTexel / s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 30 Watt | 33 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 1,870 million | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Laptop-Größe | medium sized | medium sized |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | |
Busunterstützung | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 40.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR5 / DDR3 | DDR3 |
Gemeinsamer Speicher | 0 | 0 |
Technologien |
||
CUDA | ||
GameWorks | ||
GeForce Experience | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Optimus |