NVIDIA GeForce MX130 versus NVIDIA GeForce 940M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce MX130 and NVIDIA GeForce 940M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce MX130
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 5% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1122 MHz versus 1072 MHz
- Environ 6% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1242 MHz versus 1176 MHz
- Environ 6% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 29.81 GTexel / s versus 28.22 GTexel / s
- Environ 6% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 953.9 gflops versus 903.2 gflops
- Environ 10% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 30 Watt versus 33 Watt
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1814 versus 1127
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 195 versus 154
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 6461 versus 5982
- Environ 22% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 31.613 versus 25.98
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 406.203 versus 168.449
- Environ 56% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.034 versus 1.307
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.251 versus 21.837
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 107.608 versus 101.399
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2796 versus 2132
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3686 versus 3065
- Environ 31% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2796 versus 2132
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3686 versus 3065
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 632 versus 506
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 versus 13 March 2015 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1122 MHz versus 1072 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1242 MHz versus 1176 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s versus 28.22 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops versus 903.2 gflops |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt versus 33 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 versus 1127 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 versus 154 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 versus 5982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 versus 25.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 versus 168.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 versus 1.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 versus 21.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 versus 101.399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 versus 2132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 versus 3065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 versus 2132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 versus 3065 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 versus 506 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce MX130
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 940M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1814 | 1127 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 195 | 154 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 6461 | 5982 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 31.613 | 25.98 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 406.203 | 168.449 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 2.034 | 1.307 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.251 | 21.837 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 107.608 | 101.399 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2796 | 2132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3686 | 3065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3357 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2796 | 2132 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3686 | 3065 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3357 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 632 | 506 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce MX130 | NVIDIA GeForce 940M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Maxwell | Maxwell |
| Nom de code | GM108 | GM108 |
| Date de sortie | 17 November 2017 | 13 March 2015 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1013 | 1184 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1242 MHz | 1176 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1122 MHz | 1072 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 953.9 gflops | 903.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 384 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.81 GTexel / s | 28.22 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 33 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,870 million | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 40.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 64 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5012 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 / DDR3 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| CUDA | ||
| GameWorks | ||
| GeForce Experience | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce MX130 avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
NVIDIAGeForce4 MX 460
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
ATIRadeon 9800 PRO
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 360M
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
AMDFirePro W4170M
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
NVIDIAGeForce 845M
NVIDIAGeForce MX130 vs
AMDRadeon R5 435 OEM
