NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q und NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 5 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 74% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 115 Watt vs 200 Watt
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8912 vs 3719
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8055 vs 3358
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8912 vs 3719
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8055 vs 3358
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 29 January 2019 vs 13 August 2018 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 115 Watt vs 200 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 vs 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 vs 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 vs 3358 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
- Etwa 83% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1620 MHz vs 885 MHz
- Etwa 53% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1815 MHz vs 1185 MHz
- Etwa 37% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 16059 vs 11748
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 749 vs 483
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 105171 vs 78123
- Etwa 35% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 226.447 vs 168.08
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4161.764 vs 1935.102
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 25.476 vs 22.794
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 118.544 vs 111.023
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1106.12 vs 1001.496
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 19811 vs 17328
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 19811 vs 17328
- Etwa 56% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 10685 vs 6839
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1620 MHz vs 885 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1815 MHz vs 1185 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 16059 vs 11748 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 749 vs 483 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 105171 vs 78123 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 226.447 vs 168.08 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4161.764 vs 1935.102 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 25.476 vs 22.794 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 118.544 vs 111.023 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1106.12 vs 1001.496 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 19811 vs 17328 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 19811 vs 17328 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 10685 vs 6839 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 11748 | 16059 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 749 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 78123 | 105171 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 168.08 | 226.447 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1935.102 | 4161.764 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 22.794 | 25.476 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 111.023 | 118.544 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1001.496 | 1106.12 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 17328 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8912 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8055 | 3358 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 17328 | 19811 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8912 | 3719 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8055 | 3358 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 6839 | 10685 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | Turing |
Codename | TU106 | TU104 |
Startdatum | 29 January 2019 | 13 August 2018 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 178 | 154 |
Typ | Laptop | Workstation |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $2,299 | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1185 MHz | 1815 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 885 MHz | 1620 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
Leitungssysteme | 2304 | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 115 Watt | 200 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 10,800 million | 13,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | None | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Länge | 267 mm | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 Bit | |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | 14000 MHz |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 |