NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super vs AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super und AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher, Technologien. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Etwa 5% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 215 Watt vs 225 Watt
- Etwa 10% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 18254 vs 16661
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 99912 vs 77153
- Etwa 16% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 vs 252.601
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 vs 3949.565
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 vs 24.769
- Etwa 9% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 vs 1322.129
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 vs 14699
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 vs 14699
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 215 Watt vs 225 Watt |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18254 vs 16661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 vs 77153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 vs 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 vs 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 vs 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 vs 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 vs 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 vs 14699 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Etwa 8% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1905 MHz vs 1770 MHz
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 vs 886
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 vs 158.103
- 1354.7x bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9483 vs 7
Spezifikationen | |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1905 MHz vs 1770 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 vs 886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 vs 158.103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 vs 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 vs 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 vs 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9483 vs 7 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18254 | 16661 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 | 77153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 9483 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Turing | RDNA |
Codename | TU104 | Navi 10 |
Startdatum | 2 July 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $499 | $400 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 133 | 148 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1605 MHz | 1605 MHz |
CUDA-Kerne | 2560 | |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | |
Maximale GPU-Temperatur | 88 C | |
Leitungssysteme | 2560 | |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 215 Watt | 225 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 13.6 B | 10.3 B |
Berechnungseinheiten | 40 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Texturfüllrate | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
DisplayPort-Unterstützung | ||
Dual-Link-DVI-Unterstützung | ||
G-SYNC-Unterstützung | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Multi-Monitor-Unterstützung | ||
Anzahl der gleichzeitigen Anzeigen | 4 | |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Länge | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 650 Watt | 600 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Breite | 2-Slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 14000 MHz | |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologien |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |