NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super versus AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super and AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
- Environ 5% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 215 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 10% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 18254 versus 16661
- Environ 29% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 99912 versus 77153
- Environ 16% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 293.508 versus 252.601
- Environ 2% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4045.784 versus 3949.565
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 29.145 versus 24.769
- Environ 9% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1438.826 versus 1322.129
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 25232 versus 14699
- Environ 72% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 25232 versus 14699
Caractéristiques | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt versus 225 Watt |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18254 versus 16661 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 versus 77153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 versus 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 versus 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 versus 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 versus 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 versus 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 versus 14699 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
- Environ 8% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1905 MHz versus 1770 MHz
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 927 versus 886
- Environ 61% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 254.777 versus 158.103
- 1354.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 9483 versus 7
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse augmenté | 1905 MHz versus 1770 MHz |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 927 versus 886 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 254.777 versus 158.103 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3720 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3369 versus 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3720 versus 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3369 versus 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 9483 versus 7 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super
GPU 2: AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 18254 | 16661 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 886 | 927 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 99912 | 77153 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 293.508 | 252.601 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4045.784 | 3949.565 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 29.145 | 24.769 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 158.103 | 254.777 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1438.826 | 1322.129 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 25232 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3369 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 25232 | 14699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 | 3720 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3369 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 7 | 9483 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super | AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Turing | RDNA |
Nom de code | TU104 | Navi 10 |
Date de sortie | 2 July 2019 | 7 July 2019 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $499 | $400 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 133 | 148 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1770 MHz | 1905 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1605 MHz | 1605 MHz |
Noyaux CUDA | 2560 | |
Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | |
Température maximale du GPU | 88 C | |
Pipelines | 2560 | |
Render output units | 64 | 64 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 215 Watt | 225 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 13.6 B | 10.3 B |
Unités de Compute | 40 | |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.51 TFLOPs | |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 9.75 TFLOPs | |
Pixel fill rate | 121.9 GP/s | |
Stream Processors | 2560 | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 304.8 GT/s | |
Texture Units | 160 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Display Port | 1.4 | |
Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Nombre d’écrans á la fois | 4 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 4.556” (115.7mm) | |
Longeur | 10.5” (266.74mm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 650 Watt | 600 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 6 pin + 8 pin | 1 x 8-pin and 1x6 pin |
Largeur | 2-Slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | |
Shader Model | 6.4 | |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 8 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 14000 MHz | |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Technologies |
||
Ansel | ||
HDMI 2.0b | ||
SLI | ||
VR Ready | ||
4K H264 Decode | ||
4K H264 Encode | ||
DisplayPort 1.3 HBR / 1.4 HDR Ready | ||
FreeSync | ||
H265/HEVC Decode | ||
H265/HEVC Encode | ||
HDMI 4K Support | ||
TrueAudio | ||
Virtual Super Resolution (VSR) |