NVIDIA RTX A5000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A5000 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A5000
- Etwa 28% höhere Texturfüllrate: 433.9 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s
- Etwa 33% höhere Leitungssysteme: 8192 vs 6144
- Etwa 26% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 230 Watt vs 290 Watt
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 68% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 154729 vs 137664
- Etwa 70% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 581.432 vs 342.287
- Etwa 28% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 54.372 vs 42.369
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 191.518 vs 146.214
- Etwa 13% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2038.811 vs 1807.647
| Spezifikationen | |
| Texturfüllrate | 433.9 GTexel/s vs 339.8 GTexel/s |
| Leitungssysteme | 8192 vs 6144 |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 230 Watt vs 290 Watt |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 vs 137664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 vs 342.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 vs 42.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 vs 146.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 vs 1807.647 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 35% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1575 MHz vs 1170 MHz
- Etwa 4% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1770 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Etwa 4% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 23411 vs 22553
- Etwa 2% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1051 vs 1032
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 31420 vs 22508
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 8897 vs 3714
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 8004 vs 3355
- Etwa 40% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 31420 vs 22508
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 8897 vs 3714
- 2.4x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 8004 vs 3355
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 31 May 2021 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1575 MHz vs 1170 MHz |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1770 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 23411 vs 22553 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1051 vs 1032 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 31420 vs 22508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 8897 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 8004 vs 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 31420 vs 22508 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 8897 vs 3714 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 8004 vs 3355 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A5000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 22553 | 23411 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1032 | 1051 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 154729 | 137664 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 581.432 | 342.287 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 6836.931 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 54.372 | 42.369 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 191.518 | 146.214 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2038.811 | 1807.647 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22508 | 31420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 8004 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22508 | 31420 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 8897 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 8004 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3478 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA RTX A5000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
| Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
| Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 69 | 66 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $599 | |
| Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1170 MHz | 1575 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 867.8 GFLOPS (1:32) | 339.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS (1:1) | 21.75 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 27.77 TFLOPS | 21.75 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 8192 | 6144 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 162.7 GPixel/s | 169.9 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 433.9 GTexel/s | 339.8 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 230 Watt | 290 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Formfaktor | Dual-slot | Dual-slot |
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Länge | 267 mm (10.5 inches) | 267 mm, 10.5 inches |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 550 Watt | 600 Watt |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | 1x 12-pin |
| Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 24 GB | 8 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 768 GB/s | 608.3 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 256 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |
