NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Etwa 75% höhere Texturfüllrate: 556.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s
- Etwa 78% höhere Leitungssysteme: 10496 vs 5888
- 3x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 24 GB vs 8 GB
- Etwa 20% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26733 vs 22360
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 vs 996
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 191377 vs 123160
- Etwa 61% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 732.196 vs 453.922
- Etwa 31% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 7585.258 vs 5803.174
- Etwa 55% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 63.011 vs 40.757
- Etwa 36% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 247.569 vs 182.055
- Etwa 47% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.384 vs 1664.554
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 vs 31716
- Etwa 5% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 vs 31716
- Etwa 46% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 vs 13676
Spezifikationen | |
Texturfüllrate | 556.0 GTexel/s vs 317.4 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10496 vs 5888 |
Maximale Speichergröße | 24 GB vs 8 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26733 vs 22360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 vs 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191377 vs 123160 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 vs 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 vs 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 vs 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 vs 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 vs 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 vs 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 vs 31716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 vs 13676 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Etwa 8% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz
- Etwa 2% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1725 MHz vs 1695 MHz
- Etwa 59% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 220 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Etwa 44% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 vs 3713
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 vs 3354
- 3.7x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 vs 3713
- 9.5x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 vs 3354
Spezifikationen | |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1500 MHz vs 1395 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1725 MHz vs 1695 MHz |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 220 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective vs 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Benchmarks | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 vs 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 vs 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 vs 3354 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26733 | 22360 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 | 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191377 | 123160 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 732.196 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 7585.258 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 63.011 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 247.569 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.384 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 | 13676 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA102 | GA104 |
Startdatum | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1499 | $499 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 44 | 46 |
Typ | Desktop | Desktop |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1695 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1395 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 10496 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 556.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 350 Watt | 220 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Höhe | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 750 Watt | 550 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | Triple-slot | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Formfaktor | Dual-slot | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 936.2 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |