NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 versus NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Environ 75% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 556.0 GTexel/s versus 317.4 GTexel/s
- Environ 78% de pipelines plus haut: 10496 versus 5888
- 3x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 24 GB versus 8 GB
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 26721 versus 22347
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1050 versus 996
- Environ 55% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 191323 versus 123332
- Environ 57% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 711.408 versus 453.922
- Environ 54% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 62.812 versus 40.757
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 228.496 versus 182.055
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2431.277 versus 1664.554
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 33398 versus 31716
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 33398 versus 31716
- Environ 46% meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 19948 versus 13676
Caractéristiques | |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s versus 317.4 GTexel/s |
Pipelines | 10496 versus 5888 |
Taille de mémore maximale | 24 GB versus 8 GB |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26721 versus 22347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 versus 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191323 versus 123332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 711.408 versus 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.812 versus 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 228.496 versus 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2431.277 versus 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 versus 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 versus 31716 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 versus 13676 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
- Environ 8% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1500 MHz versus 1395 MHz
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1725 MHz versus 1695 MHz
- Environ 59% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 220 Watt versus 350 Watt
- Environ 44% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective)
- Environ 5% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 5803.174 versus 5528.565
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 13566 versus 3713
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 31930 versus 3354
- 3.7x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 13566 versus 3713
- 9.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 31930 versus 3354
Caractéristiques | |
Vitesse du noyau | 1500 MHz versus 1395 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1725 MHz versus 1695 MHz |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 220 Watt versus 350 Watt |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective versus 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) |
Référence | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5803.174 versus 5528.565 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 13566 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 31930 versus 3354 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 13566 versus 3713 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 31930 versus 3354 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26721 | 22347 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1050 | 996 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 191323 | 123332 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 711.408 | 453.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 5528.565 | 5803.174 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 62.812 | 40.757 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 228.496 | 182.055 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2431.277 | 1664.554 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 33398 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3713 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 | 31930 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 33398 | 31716 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3713 | 13566 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 | 31930 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 19948 | 13676 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
Nom de code | GA102 | GA104 |
Date de sortie | 1 Sep 2020 | 1 Sep 2020 |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $1499 | $499 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 48 | 46 |
Genre | Desktop | Desktop |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1695 MHz | 1725 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1395 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Processus de fabrication | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 556.0 GFLOPS (1:64) | 317.4 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS (1:1) | 20.31 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 35.58 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS |
Pipelines | 10496 | 5888 |
Pixel fill rate | 189.8 GPixel/s | 165.6 GPixel/s |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 556.0 GTexel/s | 317.4 GTexel/s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 350 Watt | 220 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 28300 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Hauteur | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | 112 mm (4.4 inches) |
Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Longeur | 313 mm (12.3 inches) | 242 mm, 9.5 inches |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 750 Watt | 550 Watt |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 12-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Largeur | Triple-slot | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Facteur de forme | Dual-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 24 GB | 8 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 936.2 GB/s | 448.0 GB/s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 384 bit | 256 bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 1219 MHz (19.5 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz, 14 Gbps effective |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR6X | GDDR6 |