NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 vs NVIDIA Tesla T4
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 und NVIDIA Tesla T4 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 2 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 2% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1545 MHz vs 1515 MHz
- Etwa 39% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 vs 61276
- Etwa 83% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 vs 127.622
- Etwa 23% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 vs 3026.812
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 vs 18.798
- Etwa 14% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 vs 119.936
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 vs 910.721
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 vs 14076
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 vs 1976
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1781
- Etwa 44% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 vs 14076
- Etwa 88% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 vs 1976
- Etwa 89% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1781
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 13 November 2018 vs 13 September 2018 |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1545 MHz vs 1515 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 vs 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 vs 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 vs 3026.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 vs 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 vs 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 vs 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 vs 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 vs 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 vs 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1781 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 2.1x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 75 Watt vs 160 Watt
- 6.2x mehr Speichertaktfrequenz: 10000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 160 Watt |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 10000 MHz vs 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 3026.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Turing | Turing |
| Codename | TU104 | TU104 |
| GCN-Generierung | Quadro RTX | |
| Startdatum | 13 November 2018 | 13 September 2018 |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $899 | |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 211 | 270 |
| Typ | Desktop | Workstation |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1545 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 1005 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Leitungssysteme | 2304 | |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Texturfüllrate | 222.5 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Länge | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 8-pin | None |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 8 GB | |
| Speicherbandbreite | 416.0 GB/s | |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 10000 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | |


