NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 versus NVIDIA Tesla T4
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 and NVIDIA Tesla T4 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 mois plus tard
- Environ 2% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1545 MHz versus 1515 MHz
- Environ 39% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 85209 versus 61276
- Environ 83% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 232.933 versus 127.622
- Environ 23% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 3728.135 versus 3026.812
- Environ 32% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 24.872 versus 18.798
- Environ 14% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 136.223 versus 119.936
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1011.233 versus 910.721
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 20206 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3714 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 versus 1781
- Environ 44% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 20206 versus 14076
- Environ 88% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3714 versus 1976
- Environ 89% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 versus 1781
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 versus 13 September 2018 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz versus 1515 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 versus 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 versus 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 versus 3026.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 versus 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 versus 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 versus 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 versus 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 versus 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 1781 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Tesla T4
- 2.1x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 160 Watt
- 6.2x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 10000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective)
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 160 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 10000 MHz versus 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla T4
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 85209 | 61276 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 232.933 | 127.622 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 3728.135 | 3026.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 24.872 | 18.798 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.223 | 119.936 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1011.233 | 910.721 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 20206 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3714 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1781 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 20206 | 14076 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3714 | 1976 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1781 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 1873 | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10616 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 592 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 | NVIDIA Tesla T4 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Nom de code | TU104 | TU104 |
| Génération GCN | Quadro RTX | |
| Date de sortie | 13 November 2018 | 13 September 2018 |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $899 | |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 211 | 270 |
| Genre | Desktop | Workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1545 MHz | 1515 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1005 MHz | 1005 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 222.5 GFLOPS | |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 14.24 TFLOPS | |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 7.119 TFLOPS | |
| Pipelines | 2304 | |
| Pixel fill rate | 98.88 GPixel/s | |
| Render output units | 64 | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 222.5 GTexel/s | |
| Texture Units | 144 | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 160 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 13600 million | 13,600 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C | No outputs |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Longeur | 9.5 inches (241 mm) | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 8-pin | None |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.0 (12_1) |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 8 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 416.0 GB/s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 256 bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1625 MHz (13000 MHz effective) | 10000 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro RTX 4000 avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Jedi Order
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
NVIDIATITAN Xp Collector's Edition Galactic Empire
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon RX 5600 XT
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5300
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
AppleA14 Bionic
NVIDIAQuadro RTX 4000 vs
IntelArc Pro A30M
