NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A4000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile und NVIDIA RTX A4000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Etwa 16% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:855 MHz vs 735 MHz
- 7.8x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 18 Watt vs 140 Watt
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 855 MHz vs 735 MHz |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 140 Watt |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Etwa 9% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1560 MHz vs 1425 MHz
- 3.3x mehr Texturfüllrate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
- 6x mehr Leitungssysteme: 6144 vs 1024
- Ein neuerer Herstellungsprozess ermöglicht eine leistungsfähigere, aber dennoch kühlere Grafikkarte: 8 nm vs 12 nm
- 4x mehr maximale Speichergröße: 16 GB vs 4 GB
- Etwa 40% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- 2.5x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 vs 7788
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 483
- 3x bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 40286
- 2.7x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 157.821
- 2.1x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 1934.012
- 3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 10.833
- Etwa 19% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 136.552
- 2.8x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 684.333
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 9851
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2476
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2238
- 2.2x bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 9851
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2476
- Etwa 50% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2238
| Spezifikationen | |
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1560 MHz vs 1425 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 299.5 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Leitungssysteme | 6144 vs 1024 |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm vs 12 nm |
| Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB vs 4 GB |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 vs 7788 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 vs 483 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 vs 40286 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 vs 157.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 vs 1934.012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 vs 10.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 136.552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 vs 684.333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 vs 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 vs 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 vs 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 vs 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 vs 2238 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | 19545 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 1026 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | 121768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 420.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 4156.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 32.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 162.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 1895.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Turing | Ampere |
| Codename | TU117 | GA104 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 350 | 108 |
| Typ | Laptop | |
| Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1425 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 855 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Leitungssysteme | 1024 | 6144 |
| Pixel-Füllrate | 45.60 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
| Texturfüllrate | 91.20 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 18 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 4700 million | 17400 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Formfaktor | Single-slot | |
| Länge | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | |
| Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 160 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
