NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile vs NVIDIA RTX A4000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA RTX A4000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile

• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 855 MHz vs 735 MHz
• 7.8x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 140 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA RTX A4000

• Around 9% higher boost clock speed: 1560 MHz vs 1425 MHz
• 3.3x more texture fill rate: 299.5 GTexel/s vs 91.20 GTexel/s
• 6x more pipelines: 6144 vs 1024
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 8 nm vs 12 nm
• 4x more maximum memory size: 16 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
• 2.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 vs 7788
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 vs 483
• 3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 vs 40286
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 vs 157.821
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 1934.012
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 vs 10.833
• Around 19% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 136.552
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 vs 684.333
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 vs 2238
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 vs 9851
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 2476
• Around 50% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 vs 2238

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	7788 19545
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	483 1026
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	40286 121768
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	157.821 420.465
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1934.012 4156.52
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.833 32.297
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	136.552 162.131
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	684.333 1895.111
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 22050
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3355
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	9851 22050
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2476 3715
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2238 3355

Compare specifications (specs)