NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile versus NVIDIA RTX A4000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile and NVIDIA RTX A4000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 855 MHz versus 735 MHz
- 7.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 18 Watt versus 140 Watt
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz versus 735 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt versus 140 Watt |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA RTX A4000
- Environ 9% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1560 MHz versus 1425 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 299.5 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s
- 6x plus de pipelines: 6144 versus 1024
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 8 nm versus 12 nm
- 4x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 16 GB versus 4 GB
- Environ 40% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective)
- 2.5x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 19545 versus 7788
- 2.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 1026 versus 483
- 3x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 121768 versus 40286
- 2.7x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 420.465 versus 157.821
- 2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 versus 1934.012
- 3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 32.297 versus 10.833
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 versus 136.552
- 2.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 1895.111 versus 684.333
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 22050 versus 9851
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3355 versus 2238
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 22050 versus 9851
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 versus 2476
- Environ 50% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3355 versus 2238
| Caractéristiques | |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1560 MHz versus 1425 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 299.5 GTexel/s versus 91.20 GTexel/s |
| Pipelines | 6144 versus 1024 |
| Processus de fabrication | 8 nm versus 12 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 16 GB versus 4 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) versus 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 versus 7788 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 versus 483 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 versus 40286 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 versus 157.821 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 versus 1934.012 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 versus 10.833 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 versus 136.552 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 versus 684.333 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 versus 2238 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 versus 9851 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 versus 2476 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 versus 2238 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile
GPU 2: NVIDIA RTX A4000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA RTX A4000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7788 | 19545 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 483 | 1026 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 40286 | 121768 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 157.821 | 420.465 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1934.012 | 4156.52 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 10.833 | 32.297 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 136.552 | 162.131 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 684.333 | 1895.111 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 9851 | 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2476 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 2238 | 3355 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 9851 | 22050 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2476 | 3715 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2238 | 3355 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Nom de code | TU117 | GA104 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 350 | 108 |
| Genre | Laptop | |
| Date de sortie | 12 Apr 2021 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1425 MHz | 1560 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 855 MHz | 735 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 91.20 GFLOPS (1:32) | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) |
| Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 5.837 TFLOPS (2:1) | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) |
| Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 2.918 TFLOPS | 19.17 TFLOPS |
| Pipelines | 1024 | 6144 |
| Débit de remplissage de pixels | 45.60 GPixel/s | 149.8 GPixel/s |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 91.20 GTexel/s | 299.5 GTexel/s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 140 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4700 million | 17400 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 4x DisplayPort |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Facteur de forme | Single-slot | |
| Longeur | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | |
| Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1x 6-pin | |
| Largeur | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 16 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 160 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 256 bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective) | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA Quadro T1200 Mobile avec des autres
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon E8870
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIATesla P4
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon RX 570X
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
AMDRadeon Pro 5500M
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAGeForce RTX 2050 Mobile
NVIDIAQuadro T1200 Mobile vs
NVIDIAT550 Mobile
