NVIDIA RTX A4000 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA RTX A4000 und NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA RTX A4000
- 2.5x geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 140 Watt vs 350 Watt
- Um etwa 33% höhere maximale Speichergröße: 16 GB vs 12 GB
- Etwa 47% höhere Speichertaktfrequenz: 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective
- 6.3x bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 4156.52 vs 661.977
- Etwa 26% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 162.131 vs 129.036
Spezifikationen | |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt vs 350 Watt |
Maximale Speichergröße | 16 GB vs 12 GB |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) vs 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Benchmarks | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 vs 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 vs 129.036 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 1 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 86% höhere Kerntaktfrequenz:1365 MHz vs 735 MHz
- Etwa 7% höhere Boost-Taktfrequenz: 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz
- Etwa 78% höhere Texturfüllrate: 532.8 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s
- Etwa 67% höhere Leitungssysteme: 10240 vs 6144
- Etwa 38% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 26935 vs 19545
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 1088 vs 1026
- Etwa 72% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 209081 vs 121768
- Etwa 15% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 485.179 vs 420.465
- Etwa 87% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 60.472 vs 32.297
- Etwa 29% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 2441.001 vs 1895.111
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 34770 vs 22050
- Etwa 58% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 34770 vs 22050
- Etwa 95% bessere Leistung in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 5077 vs 2604
Spezifikationen | |
Startdatum | 31 May 2021 vs 12 Apr 2021 |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 1365 MHz vs 735 MHz |
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1665 MHz vs 1560 MHz |
Texturfüllrate | 532.8 GTexel/s vs 299.5 GTexel/s |
Leitungssysteme | 10240 vs 6144 |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 26935 vs 19545 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1088 vs 1026 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 209081 vs 121768 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 485.179 vs 420.465 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 60.472 vs 32.297 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 2441.001 vs 1895.111 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 34770 vs 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3355 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 34770 vs 22050 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3715 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3355 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5077 vs 2604 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA RTX A4000
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 19545 | 26935 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 1026 | 1088 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 121768 | 209081 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 420.465 | 485.179 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 4156.52 | 661.977 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 32.297 | 60.472 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 162.131 | 129.036 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 1895.111 | 2441.001 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 22050 | 34770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3715 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3355 | 3359 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 22050 | 34770 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3715 | 3718 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3355 | 3359 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2604 | 5077 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
NVIDIA RTX A4000 | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti | |
---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
Architektur | Ampere | Ampere |
Codename | GA104 | GA102 |
Startdatum | 12 Apr 2021 | 31 May 2021 |
Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 108 | 60 |
Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $1199 | |
Typ | Desktop | |
Technische Info |
||
Boost-Taktfrequenz | 1560 MHz | 1665 MHz |
Kerntaktfrequenz | 735 MHz | 1365 MHz |
Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 8 nm | 8 nm |
Peak Double Precision (FP64) Performance | 599.0 GFLOPS (1:32) | 532.8 GFLOPS (1:64) |
Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS (1:1) | 34.10 TFLOPS (1:1) |
Peak Single Precision (FP32) Performance | 19.17 TFLOPS | 34.10 TFLOPS |
Leitungssysteme | 6144 | 10240 |
Pixel fill rate | 149.8 GPixel/s | 186.5 GPixel/s |
Texturfüllrate | 299.5 GTexel/s | 532.8 GTexel/s |
Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 140 Watt | 350 Watt |
Anzahl der Transistoren | 17400 million | 28300 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
Display-Anschlüsse | 4x DisplayPort | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
Formfaktor | Single-slot | Dual-slot |
Schnittstelle | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
Länge | 241 mm (9.5 inches) | 285 mm, 11.2 inches |
Empfohlene Systemleistung (PSU) | 300 Watt | 750 Watt |
Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin | 1x 12-pin |
Breite | 112 mm (4.4 inches) | 112 mm, 4.4 inches |
Höhe | 40 mm, 1.6 inches | |
API-Unterstützung |
||
DirectX | 12.2 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
OpenCL | 3.0 | 3.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Shader Model | 6.6 | 6.7 |
Vulkan | ||
Speicher |
||
Maximale RAM-Belastung | 16 GB | 12 GB |
Speicherbandbreite | 448 GB/s | 912.4 GB/s |
Breite des Speicherbusses | 256 bit | 384 bit |
Speichertaktfrequenz | 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) | 1188 MHz, 19 Gbps effective |
Speichertyp | GDDR6 | GDDR6X |