NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Vergleichende Analyse von NVIDIA Tesla C2075 und NVIDIA Quadro 6000 Videokarten für alle bekannten Merkmale in den folgenden Kategorien: Essenzielles, Technische Info, Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse, Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen, API-Unterstützung, Speicher. Benchmark-Videokarten Leistungsanalyse: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Unterschiede
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Tesla C2075
- Grafikkarte ist neuer: Startdatum 7 Monat(e) später
- Etwa 12% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2704
- Etwa 7% bessere Leistung in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10563 vs 9850
- Etwa 11% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 24.377
- Etwa 17% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 vs 793.755
- Etwa 18% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 2.66
- Etwa 32% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 34.891
- Etwa 3% bessere Leistung in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.747 vs 90.839
| Spezifikationen | |
| Startdatum | 25 July 2011 vs 10 December 2010 |
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 575 MHz vs 574 MHz |
| Texturfüllrate | 32.2 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,030.4 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 3000 MHz vs 2988 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 vs 2704 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10563 vs 9850 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 vs 24.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 vs 793.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 vs 2.66 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 vs 34.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 vs 90.839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 vs 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 vs 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3335 |
Gründe, die für die Berücksichtigung der NVIDIA Quadro 6000
- Etwa 21% geringere typische Leistungsaufnahme: 204 Watt vs 247 Watt
- Etwa 6% bessere Leistung in PassMark - G2D Mark: 455 vs 428
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3501 vs 2825
- Etwa 24% bessere Leistung in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3501 vs 2825
| Spezifikationen | |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 204 Watt vs 247 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 455 vs 428 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3501 vs 2825 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3501 vs 2825 |
Benchmarks vergleichen
GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 3017 | 2704 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 428 | 455 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 10563 | 9850 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 26.973 | 24.377 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 930.623 | 793.755 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 3.142 | 2.66 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.924 | 34.891 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 93.747 | 90.839 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2825 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3705 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 | 3335 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2825 | 3501 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3705 | 3689 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 | 3335 |
Vergleichen Sie Spezifikationen
| NVIDIA Tesla C2075 | NVIDIA Quadro 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essenzielles |
||
| Architektur | Fermi 2.0 | Fermi |
| Codename | GF110 | GF100 |
| Startdatum | 25 July 2011 | 10 December 2010 |
| Platz in der Leistungsbewertung | 767 | 769 |
| Typ | Workstation | Workstation |
| Einführungspreis (MSRP) | $4,399 | |
| Jetzt kaufen | $332.21 | |
| Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis (0-100) | 12.86 | |
Technische Info |
||
| Kerntaktfrequenz | 575 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Gleitkomma-Leistung | 1,030.4 gflops | 1,027.7 gflops |
| Fertigungsprozesstechnik | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Leitungssysteme | 448 | 448 |
| Texturfüllrate | 32.2 GTexel / s | 32.1 GTexel / s |
| Thermische Designleistung (TDP) | 247 Watt | 204 Watt |
| Anzahl der Transistoren | 3,000 million | 3,100 million |
Videoausgänge und Anschlüsse |
||
| Display-Anschlüsse | 1x DVI | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video |
Kompatibilität, Abmessungen und Anforderungen |
||
| Schnittstelle | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Länge | 248 mm | 248 mm |
| Zusätzliche Leistungssteckverbinder | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
API-Unterstützung |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Speicher |
||
| Maximale RAM-Belastung | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Speicherbandbreite | 144.0 GB / s | 143.4 GB / s |
| Breite des Speicherbusses | 384 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Speichertaktfrequenz | 3000 MHz | 2988 MHz |
| Speichertyp | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |

