NVIDIA Tesla C2075 vs NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Tesla C2075 and NVIDIA Quadro 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

NVIDIA Tesla C2075

NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla C2075

Videocard is newer: launch date 7 month(s) later
Around 12% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 3017 vs 2685
Around 7% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 10493 vs 9850
Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 26.973 vs 24.377
Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 930.623 vs 793.755
Around 18% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 3.142 vs 2.66
Around 32% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.924 vs 34.891
Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 93.747 vs 90.839

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 July 2011 vs 10 December 2010
Core clock speed	575 MHz vs 574 MHz
Texture fill rate	32.2 GTexel / s vs 32.1 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops vs 1,027.7 gflops
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz vs 2988 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	3017 vs 2685
Geekbench - OpenCL	10493 vs 9850
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.973 vs 24.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	930.623 vs 793.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.142 vs 2.66
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.924 vs 34.891
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.747 vs 90.839
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3705 vs 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346 vs 3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3705 vs 3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346 vs 3335

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 6000

Around 21% lower typical power consumption: 204 Watt vs 247 Watt
Around 4% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 446 vs 428
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3501 vs 2825
Around 24% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3501 vs 2825

Specifications (specs)
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	204 Watt vs 247 Watt
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	446 vs 428
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3501 vs 2825
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3501 vs 2825

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Tesla C2075
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 6000

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

3017

2685

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

428

446

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

10493

9850

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

26.973

24.377

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

930.623

793.755

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3.142

2.66

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

45.924

34.891

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

93.747

90.839

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2825

3501

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3705

3689

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3335

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

2825

3501

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3705

3689

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3346

3335

Name	NVIDIA Tesla C2075	NVIDIA Quadro 6000
PassMark - G3D Mark	3017	2685
PassMark - G2D Mark	428	446
Geekbench - OpenCL	10493	9850
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	26.973	24.377
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	930.623	793.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	3.142	2.66
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.924	34.891
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	93.747	90.839
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	2825	3501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3705	3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3346	3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	2825	3501
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3705	3689
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3346	3335

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA Tesla C2075	NVIDIA Quadro 6000
Essentials
Architecture	Fermi 2.0	Fermi
Code name	GF110	GF100
Launch date	25 July 2011	10 December 2010
Place in performance rating	789	792
Type	Workstation	Workstation
Launch price (MSRP)		$4,399
Price now		$332.21
Value for money (0-100)		12.86
Technical info
Core clock speed	575 MHz	574 MHz
Floating-point performance	1,030.4 gflops	1,027.7 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	40 nm
Pipelines	448	448
Texture fill rate	32.2 GTexel / s	32.1 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	247 Watt	204 Watt
Transistor count	3,000 million	3,100 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	248 mm	248 mm
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	6 GB	6 GB
Memory bandwidth	144.0 GB / s	143.4 GB / s
Memory bus width	384 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	3000 MHz	2988 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5