AMD E-300 vs AMD A6-3500
Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and AMD A6-3500 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E-300
- 3.6x lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 65 Watt
- Around 88% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 0.502 vs 0.267
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 65 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.502 vs 0.267 |
Reasons to consider the AMD A6-3500
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
- Around 62% higher clock speed: 2.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 32 nm vs 40 nm
- 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- 3x more L2 cache, more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- 2.4x better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 963 vs 394
- 4.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1420 vs 340
- 3x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 307 vs 104
- 4.1x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 770 vs 186
- 5.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 26.895 vs 4.83
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 719 vs 250
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4450 vs 1461
- 2.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 719 vs 250
- 3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 4450 vs 1461
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Number of cores | 3 vs 2 |
| Maximum frequency | 2.1 GHz vs 1.3 GHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 32 nm vs 40 nm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB (per core) vs 128 KB |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB (per core) vs 1024 KB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 963 vs 394 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 1420 vs 340 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 307 vs 104 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 770 vs 186 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 26.895 vs 4.83 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 719 vs 250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4450 vs 1461 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 719 vs 250 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 4450 vs 1461 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD A6-3500
| PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | AMD E-300 | AMD A6-3500 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - Single thread mark | 394 | 963 |
| PassMark - CPU mark | 340 | 1420 |
| Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 104 | 307 |
| Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 186 | 770 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.502 | 0.267 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 | 26.895 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 | 719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1461 | 4450 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 | 719 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1461 | 4450 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1.595 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.083 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 7.184 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| AMD E-300 | AMD A6-3500 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture codename | Zacate | Llano |
| Launch date | 22 August 2011 | August 2011 |
| Place in performance rating | 3002 | 2252 |
| Series | AMD E-Series | |
| Vertical segment | Laptop | Desktop |
Performance |
||
| 64 bit support | ||
| Die size | 75 mm | 228 mm |
| L1 cache | 128 KB | 128 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1024 KB (per core) |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 32 nm |
| Maximum frequency | 1.3 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
| Number of cores | 2 | 3 |
| Number of threads | 2 | |
| Transistor count | 1178 million | |
Memory |
||
| Supported memory types | DDR3 | DDR3 |
Compatibility |
||
| Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | FM1 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 65 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
| AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Navigation
Choose a CPU
Compare processors
Compare AMD E-300 with others
AMDE-300 vs
AMDTurion 64 MT-37
AMDE-300 vs
IntelCeleron Dual-Core T3000
AMDE-300 vs
AMDE-350
AMDE-300 vs
IntelAtom E3845
AMDE-300 vs
IntelCeleron 807UE
AMDE-300 vs
AMDGX-217GA
