AMD E-300 vs AMD Phenom II X3 P820
Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and AMD Phenom II X3 P820 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the AMD E-300
- CPU is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 45 nm
- Around 39% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 25 Watt
Launch date | 22 August 2011 vs 12 May 2010 |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 45 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt vs 25 Watt |
Reasons to consider the AMD Phenom II X3 P820
- 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 3 vs 2
- 1 more threads: 3 vs 2
- Around 38% higher clock speed: 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
- 3x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
- Around 50% more L2 cache; more data can be stored in the L2 cache for quick access later
- Around 82% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 717 vs 394
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 1068 vs 339
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 227 vs 104
- 3.4x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 640 vs 186
Specifications (specs) | |
Number of cores | 3 vs 2 |
Number of threads | 3 vs 2 |
Maximum frequency | 1.8 GHz vs 1.3 GHz |
L1 cache | 384 KB vs 128 KB |
L2 cache | 1.5 MB vs 1024 KB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - Single thread mark | 717 vs 394 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 1068 vs 339 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 227 vs 104 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 640 vs 186 |
Compare benchmarks
CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD Phenom II X3 P820
PassMark - Single thread mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - CPU mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Single Core |
|
|
||||
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core |
|
|
Name | AMD E-300 | AMD Phenom II X3 P820 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - Single thread mark | 394 | 717 |
PassMark - CPU mark | 339 | 1068 |
Geekbench 4 - Single Core | 104 | 227 |
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core | 186 | 640 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 0.502 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 4.83 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 250 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1461 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 250 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 754 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1461 |
Compare specifications (specs)
AMD E-300 | AMD Phenom II X3 P820 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture codename | Zacate | Champlain |
Launch date | 22 August 2011 | 12 May 2010 |
Place in performance rating | 3001 | 2961 |
Series | AMD E-Series | 3x AMD Phenom II |
Vertical segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Performance |
||
64 bit support | ||
Die size | 75 mm | |
L1 cache | 128 KB | 384 KB |
L2 cache | 1024 KB | 1.5 MB |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 45 nm |
Maximum frequency | 1.3 GHz | 1.8 GHz |
Number of cores | 2 | 3 |
Number of threads | 2 | 3 |
Front-side bus (FSB) | 3600 MHz | |
Memory |
||
Supported memory types | DDR3 | |
Compatibility |
||
Max number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | |
Sockets supported | FT1 BGA 413-Ball | S1 |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 18 Watt | 25 Watt |
Virtualization |
||
AMD Virtualization (AMD-V™) | ||
Advanced Technologies |
||
VirusProtect |