AMD E-300 vs AMD Turion 64 ML-37

Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and AMD Turion 64 ML-37 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-300

• CPU is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• 1 more cores, run more applications at once: 2 vs 1
• 1 more threads: 2 vs 1
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 90 nm
• Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt
• Around 1% better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 339 vs 334

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion 64 ML-37

• Around 54% higher clock speed: 2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 510 vs 394

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD Turion 64 ML-37

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	394 510
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	339 334

Compare specifications (specs)