AMD E-300 vs AMD Turion X2 RM-75

Comparative analysis of AMD E-300 and AMD Turion X2 RM-75 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Virtualization, Advanced Technologies. Benchmark processor performance analysis: PassMark - Single thread mark, PassMark - CPU mark, Geekbench 4 - Single Core, Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the AMD E-300

• CPU is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 94% lower typical power consumption: 18 Watt vs 35 Watt

Reasons to consider the AMD Turion X2 RM-75

• Around 69% higher clock speed: 2.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz
• 2x more L1 cache, more data can be stored in the L1 cache for quick access later
• Around 95% better performance in PassMark - Single thread mark: 770 vs 394
• 2.1x better performance in PassMark - CPU mark: 708 vs 339
• 8.9x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Single Core: 930 vs 104
• 8.8x better performance in Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core: 1646 vs 186

Compare benchmarks

CPU 1: AMD E-300
CPU 2: AMD Turion X2 RM-75

PassMark - Single thread mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	394 770
PassMark - CPU mark	CPU 1 CPU 2	339 708
Geekbench 4 - Single Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	104 930
Geekbench 4 - Multi-Core	CPU 1 CPU 2	186 1646

Compare specifications (specs)